Nadrich & Cohen Accident Injury Lawyers Logo
Call Us 24/7 (800) 718-4658
  • LOCATIONS
    • BAKERSFIELD
    • FRESNO
    • HAYWARD
    • LOS ANGELES
    • MODESTO
    • PALM DESERT
    • QUINCY
    • RICHMOND
    • SACRAMENTO
    • SALINAS
    • SAN FRANCISCO
    • SANTA ROSA
    • SUSANVILLE
    • TRACY
    • YREKA
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • PERSONAL INJURY
    • CAR ACCIDENTS
    • MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENTS
    • TRUCK ACCIDENTS
    • BICYCLE ACCIDENTS
    • SLIP & FALL
    • DOG BITES
    • HAZARDOUS EXPOSURE
    • MEDICAL DEVICE DEFECTS
    • DANGEROUS DRUGS
    • DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS
    • WILDFIRES
    • SEXUAL ABUSE
  • PARAQUAT
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT US
    • JEFF NADRICH BIO
    • RANDAL COHEN BIO
    • CASE RESULTS
    • REVIEWS
    • TESTIMONIALS
    • FAQs
    • ATTORNEY REFERRALS
    • SCHOLARSHIP
  • CONTACT

(800) 718-4658
CONTACT US

Free Case Evaluation

Lock-Icon We value your privacy

Blog » Personal Injury » Lawsuit Disputes Modesto Inn’s Business Interruption Insurance Claim Denial

Lawsuit Disputes Modesto Inn’s Business Interruption Insurance Claim Denial

Published: October 24, 2020

Modesto overpass sign - Water wealth contentment health

A lawsuit filed in Stanislaus County Superior Court disputes a Modesto inn’s COVID-19 business interruption insurance claim denial.

The lawsuit was filed by Ramada Inn Modesto and named multiple Farmers Insurance entities as defendants. The complaint is seeking a declaratory judgment mandating that the Farmers entities honor a valid contract, as well as seeking damages based on breach of contract.

The complaint notes that Farmers’ website advertised that their policies help insureds replace lost income while their companies are shut down. The complaint also notes that Farmers was apparently aware of the importance of business interruption insurance, as their website said as much, noting their policies help closed businesses with lost profits, payroll, taxes and more.

The complaint argues the Farmers entities reflexively deny coverage with only their own profits in mind.

Definition Of “Direct Physical Loss” An Issue

Farmers entities are denying COVID-19 business interruption insurance claims because they are claiming that COVID-19 business shutdowns don’t constitute a physical loss, according to the complaint. The complaint argues that COVID-19 shutdowns are physical losses because using or accessing property is inherently physical in nature and thus preventing use or access to property constitutes a loss of a physical nature.

The complaint argues that the policy language covers any suspension of business operations that are the result of direct physical loss. The complaint implies Farmers entities chose not to define “direct physical loss” so they could exploit the lack of definition in order deny claims for the sake of their own profits.

Inn Basically Forced To Shut Down By State

The complaint states that the inn was essentially forced to shut down by state orders mandating that hotel workers stay at home unless the hotel is used for containment, treatment or mitigation of COVID-19. The complaint also states that the inn “incurred great expense” spending money on disinfectants, masks, bleach, Plexiglas and hand-sanitization stations.

Relief Claims

The lawsuit seeks the following:

Declaratory Judgment

The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment mandating that the Farmers entities honor the inn’s contract, bringing this cause of action under California Rule of Civil Procedure Section 1060 et seq.

Breach Of Contract

The complaint claims the Farmers entities breached the inn’s contract by wrongly denying their business interruption insurance claim, claiming the decision to deny the claim was solely based on the entities’ interpretation of the contract language rather than being based on any specifics or investigation.

Jeffrey Nadrich

Jeffrey Nadrich is a nationally-recognized California plaintiff’s personal injury attorney. He is a graduate of UC Berkeley and UC Hastings College of the Law. He has successfully represented thousands of injury clients over the last 40 years.

Personal Injury Related Posts:

Can An Undocumented Immigrant Make A Personal Injury Claim?
Diffuse Axonal Injury After a California Car Accident
Fireworks Can Pose A Significant Fire Risk
Free Case Evaluation
Sidebar Form

Lock-Icon We value your privacy
Why Choose Us?
  • Available 24/7
  • Trusted Since 1990
  • Local to You
  • Recovered $350,000,000
  • 5 Star Reviews
  • Free Case Evaluation
  • VIP Service
  • No Win, No Fee

How Can We Help You?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Lock-Icon We value your privacy
(800) 718-4658
24/7 Injury Lawyer
Email Us
info@personalinjurylawcal.com
Fax
(800) 995 2980
© 2023 Nadrich & Cohen Accident Injury Lawyers All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Accessibility